CLIL下的學習過程如何評估?

「學習」如何在CLIL的學程下發生?我們需要從學習過程(process)的證據來評估。在課堂中,小組活動時的會話如果能夠轉寫成逐字稿,這對於不了解CLIL的人來說,就有一個認識CLIL的視窗。或者,利用Coyle,Hood and Marsh (2010b) 建議的LOCIT(Lesson Observation and Critical Incident Technique)的方式,將課堂上學習發生的時刻剪輯成不到15分鐘的影片,和學生、和同儕一起分析、探討,也是可以評估學程能夠對於學習過程產生的影響。

目前,評估CLIL學習過程的研究多集中於語言方面(Dalton-Puffer & Nikula, 2006) 。而(Airey, 2009) 嘗試將以內容為基礎的前提下和語言表現連結,他測量學習者在科學領域的演講速度和句子長度。

在評估學程中學習過程的影響時,可以從語言的角度來評估,這時焦點可能是語言的功能、句法或語法能力;也可以從使用語言在處理概念或者是否其是否展現理解來看;更甚者,從小組中,彼此協商的過程,語義和文本如何被建構,也是一個評估的角度。

References

Airey, J. (2009). Estimating undergraduate bilingual scientific literacy in Sweden. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 26-35.
Campo, A., Grisaleña, J. & Alonso, E. (2007). Trilingual Students in Secondary School: A New Reality. Bilbao: Basque Institute of Educational Evaluation and Research, , .
Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010c). Evaluating and creating materials and tasks for CLIL classroom. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010a). Evaluating the impact of CLIL programmes. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010b). The CLIL Tool Kit: Transforming theory into practice. In (), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., Schindelegger, U. & Smit, U. (2009). Technology-Geeks Speak Out: What Students Think About Vocational CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 18-25.
Dalton-Puffer, C. & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 241-267.
De Graaff, R., Jan Koopman, G., Anikina, Y. & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603-624.
Hood, P. (2006). Unpublished data from CLIL research interviews with students at Tile Hill Wood Language College. , , .
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), .
Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4-17.
Marsh, D. et al. (2008). Profile Report: Bilingual Education (English) in Poland. Warszawa: The National Centre for Teacher Training and Development (CODN) & British Council Poland, , .
Moate, J. M. (2011). The impact of foreign language mediated teaching on teachers’ sense of professional integrity in the CLIL classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 333-346.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 60-73.
Westhoff, G. (2004). The art of playing a pinball machine. Characteristics of effective SLA-tasks. Babylonia, 12(3), 58-62.
Woodfield, J. & Neofitou, A. (2006). Immersion Project Research Findings. , , .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *